Check if the trailing / in the original matchPackagePatterns was intentional.
Verify the regex syntax for matchPackageNames to ensure it correctly matches intended patterns.
The PR title claims to add minimumReleaseAge for all dependencies, but the diff only partially implements this. The JSON syntax is invalid (unclosed object) and the exempted deps rule's minimumReleaseAge=0 may not align with the 'all deps' promise.
Verify if all dependency rules now have minimumReleaseAge set as promised in the title
Clarify if the exempted deps rule is intentional or a leftover
Fix JSON syntax error: ensure all objects are properly closed
The changes align with the title's intent of configuring matchManagers for cooldown ignore. The JSON syntax is correct. Minor suggestions: title has a typo ('mention manages' → 'match managers') and description is empty.
Add description to explain the purpose of the changes
Update PR title to fix typo: 'fix: match managers in ignore of cooldown for local deps'
The changes align with the PR title and description. The diff correctly updates configuration files to ignore cooldown for internal deps and ensure all rules extend the common package. No obvious issues or inconsistencies found.
Ensure all packageRules for internal deps correctly set minimumReleaseAge to null
Verify if renovate.json should still extend the common package as part of the configuration hierarchy
Fix the circular extends in common.json by removing the self-reference
The PR introduces a circular reference in common.json by extending itself, which is invalid. Additionally, renovate.json no longer extends the common package, which may break the intended configuration hierarchy.
Ensure all packageRules for internal deps correctly set minimumReleaseAge to null
Verify if renovate.json should still extend the common package as part of the configuration hierarchy
Fix the circular extends in common.json by removing the self-reference
The PR aligns with the title and description by replacing the local release-git-tag action with a shared workflow. The YAML syntax is correct and the changes are intentional.
The PR description is empty - adding a brief explanation of the changes would improve clarity.